On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:13:15AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 12/22/2011 05:01 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > >On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 06:40:31PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >>No virt is crap, it needs to die, its horrid, and any solution aimed > >>squarely at virt only is shit and not worth considering, that simple. > > > >Removing this phrase from context (feel free to object on that basis > >to the following inquiry), what are your concerns with virtualization > >itself? Is it the fact that having an unknownable operating system under > >your feet uncomfortable only, or is there something else? Because virt > >is green, it saves silicon. > > Oh man, if you say virt solves global warming, I think I'm going to > have to jump off a bridge to end the madness... I said it is green (saves energy) and it saves silicon (therefore saves fuel?). The rest of conclusions are your own. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
