Re: [PATCH 1/8] KVM: MMU: combine unsync and unsync_children

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



About naming issues in the kvm mmu code.

Not restricted to your patch series, so please take as a suggestion
for the future.

(2011/12/16 19:13), Xiao Guangrong wrote:
+static bool sp_is_unsync(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
+{
+	return sp->role.level == PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL&&  sp->unsync;
+}

is_unsync_sp() is more consistent with others?
	e.g. is_large_pte(), is_writable_pte(), is_last_spte()


	Takuya

+
+static unsigned int sp_unsync_children_num(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
+{
+	unsigned int num = 0;
+
+	if (sp->role.level != PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL)
+		num = sp->unsync_children;
+
+	return num;
+}
+
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux