On 14 Dec 2011, at 04:43, Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Matt Evans <matt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +int irq__register_device(u32 dev, u8 *num, u8 *pin, u8 *line)
>> +{
>> + fprintf(stderr, "irq__register_device(%d, [%d], [%d], [%d]\n",
>> + dev, *num, *pin, *line);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void irq__init(struct kvm *kvm)
>> +{
>> + fprintf(stderr, __func__);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int irq__add_msix_route(struct kvm *kvm, struct msi_msg *msg)
>> +{
>> + die(__FUNCTION__);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>>
>> +void kvm__irq_line(struct kvm *kvm, int irq, int level)
>> +{
>> + fprintf(stderr, "irq_line(%d, %d)\n", irq, level);
>> +}
>
> What's the plan with these functions? Will you need these on PPC? If
> yes, why not implement them properly now? If not, we need to drop them
> from PPC arch.
Yes, they're filled in in the later XICS patch.
Cheers,
Matt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
