On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 12:03 +1100, Matt Evans wrote:
> On 09/12/11 19:29, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> If you also got kernel patches that add __SANE_USERSPACE_TYPES__ to the
> >> headers, and KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS to KVM PPC, we can carry them in the KVM
> >> tools tree as well.
> >
> > Yup, all we need is ACKs from PPC maintainers.
>
> Cool, I've pinged them re. __SANE_USERSPACE_TYPES__, and that would be useful to
> carry in your tree. But, IMHO, the patch I sent to Alex ("[PATCH] KVM: PPC: Add
> KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS and KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS") should go in via his tree. The
> KVM/PPC-HV kernel folk will get it quicker in their trees (pulled from Alex) and
> it's not a build problem, "only" a limit of SMP CPU numbers. That is, if you're
> building a kernel for PPC KVM today you'll probably use something more similar
> to Alex's tree than mainline/kvm tools tree.
Definitely. The __SANE_USERSPACE_TYPES__ patch should probably go to
powerpc git tree in addition to our tree.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
