On 09/12/11 18:53, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 17:56 +1100, Matt Evans wrote:
>> @@ -30,4 +31,18 @@ struct kvm_cpu {
>> struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_ring *ring;
>> };
>>
>> +/*
>> + * As these are such simple wrappers, let's have them in the header so they'll
>> + * be cheaper to call:
>> + */
>> +static inline bool kvm_cpu__emulate_io(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port, void *data, int direction, int size, u32 count)
>> +{
>> + return kvm__emulate_io(kvm, port, data, direction, size, count);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline bool kvm_cpu__emulate_mmio(struct kvm *kvm, u64 phys_addr, u8 *data, u32 len, u8 is_write)
>> +{
>> + return kvm_cpu__emulate_mmio(kvm, phys_addr, data, len, is_write);
>
> This is probably wrong. kvm_cpu__emulate_mmio just calls itself over and
> over.
Urgh, not just probably -- C&P strikes again. Consider it fixed.
Thanks!
Matt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
