Re: [PATCH 0/11] RFC: PCI using capabilitities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2011-12-11 at 11:05 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> mmios are strictly ordered.
> 
> Perhaps your printfs are reordered by buffering?  Are they from
> different threads?  Are you using coalesced mmio (which is still
> strictly ordered, if used correctly)? 

I print the queue_selector and queue_address in the printfs, even if
printfs were reordered they would be printing the data right, unlike
they do now. It's the data in the printfs that matters, not their order.

Same vcpu thread with both accesses.

Not using coalesced mmio.

-- 

Sasha.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux