On 2011-12-06 14:55, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 12/06/2011 02:58 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> In this revision, I'm now trying the approach of backend/frontend >> split-ups for the affected IRQ chips. That means we keep a single qdev >> device description but fork off specific logic early during device init. >> The backends support this by providing hooks that user space and KVM >> models can implement differently. >> >> The result is slightly larger and comes with the not really beautiful >> ioapic.kvm_gsi_base property but should otherwise meet expectations. >> >> Comments? > > Looks good to me, much nicer than the previous approaches. I'll wait a > bit for more reviews though. > >> PS: Series is still against old uq/master, therefore containing patches >> that took/will take different routes. > > I just pushed a rebased uq/master. In the future, either ping me or > just base on upstream (which uq/master supposedly tracks). Requires minor rebasing. Will wait for comments before reposting. Thanks, Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
