Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] uq/master: Introduce basic irqchip support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2011-12-06 14:55, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 12/06/2011 02:58 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> In this revision, I'm now trying the approach of backend/frontend
>> split-ups for the affected IRQ chips. That means we keep a single qdev
>> device description but fork off specific logic early during device init.
>> The backends support this by providing hooks that user space and KVM
>> models can implement differently.
>>
>> The result is slightly larger and comes with the not really beautiful
>> ioapic.kvm_gsi_base property but should otherwise meet expectations.
>>
>> Comments?
> 
> Looks good to me, much nicer than the previous approaches.  I'll wait a
> bit for more reviews though.
> 
>> PS: Series is still against old uq/master, therefore containing patches
>> that took/will take different routes.
> 
> I just pushed a rebased uq/master.  In the future, either ping me or
> just base on upstream (which uq/master supposedly tracks).

Requires minor rebasing. Will wait for comments before reposting.

Thanks,
Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux