On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 12:22:53PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 12/05/2011 12:18 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > > > > > We can, but that's a bigger change. > > > > > Is it? I do not see a lot of accesses to vcpu array except those loops. > > > > Well actually some of those loops have to go away and be replaced by a > hash lookup with apic id as key. > Yes, but apic ids are guest controllable, so there should be separate hash that will hold vcpu to gust configured apic id mapping. Shouldn't prevent us from moving to rculist now. -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
