On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:39:37PM +0800, Liu ping fan wrote: > On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 07:53:37PM +0800, Liu ping fan wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On 2011-12-02 07:26, Liu Ping Fan wrote: > >> >> From: Liu Ping Fan <pingfank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> > >> >> Currently, vcpu can be destructed only when kvm instance destroyed. > >> >> Change this to vcpu's destruction taken when its refcnt is zero, > >> >> and then vcpu MUST and CAN be destroyed before kvm's destroy. > >> > > >> > I'm lacking the big picture yet (would be good to have in the change log > >> > - at least I'm too lazy to read the code): > >> > > >> > What increments the refcnt, what decrements it again? IOW, how does user > >> > space controls the life-cycle of a vcpu after your changes? > >> > > >> In local APIC mode, delivering IPI to target APIC, target's refcnt is > >> incremented, and decremented when finished. At other times, using RCU to > > Why is this needed? > > > Suppose the following scene: > > #define kvm_for_each_vcpu(idx, vcpup, kvm) \ > for (idx = 0; \ > idx < atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus) && \ > (vcpup = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, idx)) != NULL; \ > idx++) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> > Here kvm_vcpu's destruction is called > vcpup->vcpu_id ... //oops! > > And this is exactly how your code looks. i.e you do not increment reference count in most of the loops, you only increment it twice (in pic_unlock() and kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic()) because you are using vcpu outside of rcu_read_lock() protected section and I do not see why not just extend protected section to include kvm_vcpu_kick(). As far as I can see this function does not sleep. What should protect vcpu from disappearing in your example above is RCU itself if you are using it right. But since I do not see any calls to rcu_assign_pointer()/rcu_dereference() I doubt you are using it right actually. -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html