On 12/04/2011 03:16 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-12-04 14:12, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 12/03/2011 01:17 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Rename msix_supported to msi_supported and control MSI and MSI-X
> >> activation this way. That was likely to original intention for this
> >> flag, but MSI support came after MSI-X.
> >
> > 'and' is a dangerous word in a changelog entry.
>
> This patch hardly qualifies for two IMHO.
If we don't have to change it, no.
>
> >
> >>
> >> +
> >> + if (!msi_supported) {
> >> + return -ENOTSUP;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >>
> >
> > This changes behaviour. qemu 1.0 -M pc-1.0 and qemu-1.1 -M pc-1.0 will
> > be different after this, no?
> >
>
> Only isapc had msix_supported = 0, and I doubt we got there (msi_init)
> for that machine. Or am I missing something?
>
Ah, I thought it was a user-settable property, but it isn't.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
