On 12/01/2011 03:10 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 12/01/2011 02:57 PM, Carsten Otte wrote: > > Hi Avi, Hi Marcelo, > > > > this patch series introduces an interface to allow a privileged userspace > > program to control a KVM virtual machine. The interface is intended for > > use by a machine simulator called CECSIM that can simulate an entire > > mainframe machine with nested virtualization and I/O for the purpose > > of testing and debugging its firmware prior to availability of silicon. > > This patchset allows for concurrent use of the KVM device driver to drive > > both regular and user controlled virtual machines at the same time. > > I would kindly like to ask for review and inclusion of these patches. > > So, this moves the responsibility of handling intercepts from the kernel > to userspace, yes? > > How much of the kvm code continues to be active after this? Perhaps it > makes sense to have a separate interface for this. Okay, I read the code and I even think I understood a little bit of it. In general the patches look okay, I had only minor comments. But please do document all the new interfaces. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
