Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: Dirty logging optimization using rmap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(2011/11/30 14:02), Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:

IIUC, even though O(1) is O(1) at the timing of GET DIRTY LOG, it needs O(N) write
protections with respect to the total number of dirty pages: distributed, but
actually each page fault, which should be logged, does some write protection?

Sorry, was not precise.  It depends on the level, and not completely distributed.
But I think it is O(N), and the total number of costs will not change so much,
I guess.

	Takuya


In general, what kind of improvements actually needed for live migration?

Thanks,
Takuya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux