Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: optimize memslots searching

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/20/2011 01:29 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/18/2011 11:16 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> > This is the more work base on my v1 patchset which is posted some months ago,
> > it can be found at:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/22/68
> >
> > Change log:
> > - sort memslots base on its size and do the line search instead of binary
> >   search base on gfn, it is from Avi's idea.
> > - in order to reduce cache footprint, memslots are sorted in the array of
> >   kvm->memslots->memslots[] and introduce a table to map slot id to index in
> >   the array
> >
> > There is the performance result:
> >
> > autotest for RHEL.6.1 setup/boot/reboot/shutdown(average):
> > ept=1:	before: 449.5	after: 447.8
> > ept=0:	before: 532.7	after: 529.8
> >
> > kernbench(average):
> > ept=1:	before: 127.94	after: 126.98
> > ept=0:	before: 196.85	after: 189.66
>
> Looks good, had a couple of comments but they're really minor.
>

btw, this patchset touches a lot of common code.  Did you crossbuild for
other kvm archs?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux