On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> I've never heard ABI incompatibility used as an argument for perf. Ingo?
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Vince Weaver <vince@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Never overtly. They're too clever for that.
If you want me to take you seriously, spare me from the conspiracy theories, OK?
I'm sure perf developers break the ABI sometimes - that happens
elsewhere in the kernel as well. However, Ted claimed that perf
developers use tools/perf as an excuse to break the ABI _on purpose_
which is something I have hard time believing.
Your snarky remarks doesn't really help this discussion either. It's
apparent from the LKML discussions that you're more interested in
arguing with the perf developers rather than helping them.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
