On 11/07/2011 04:44 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>>> This a guest ABI change. Do we want -M support for it? >>> >>> Given that the old subsystem id isn't valid I'd say no unless someone >>> comes up with a good reason. >> >> Do we know that Windows won't complain about it? > > > I thought the original motivation for the default subsystem ids was > that some Windows test suite was explicitly complaining about having > invalid subsystem ids? I think so, but that's unrelated. The worry is that some DRM code checksums your hardware and complains if it changed too much. Nothing to do with the test suite. The sense of Gerd's comment is reversed. We should preserve the ABI unless there is a strong reason not to. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
