Re: Secure KVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 10:37 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Nov 2011 22:40:20 +0200, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The solution is also simple to explain: Split the devices into different
> > processes and use seccomp to sandbox each device into the exact set of
> > resources it needs to operate, nothing more and nothing less.
> 
> lguest does a process per device.  Actually, it uses clone for legacy
> reasons, but I have a patch which changes it to processes.
> 
> It works well, and it's *simple*.  I suggest looking at
> Documentation/virtual/lguest/lguest.c.
> 
> Good luck!
> Rusty.

Yup, thats pretty much what I want to have.

As you said, clone() isn't really an option - sharing things like the VM
and handles is something which I want to avoid. How does your patch
handle IPC?

-- 

Sasha.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux