On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 03:37:42PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 11/03/2011 02:11 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 12:37:04PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > > > On 11/03/2011 01:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > Add a flexible mechanism to specify virtio configuration layout, using > > > > pci vendor-specific capability. A separate capability is used for each > > > > of common, device specific and data-path accesses. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How about posting the spec change instead of patches? > > > > We need both of course but I typically start with patches. > > Easier to see whether it's even possible to implement the > > spec without overhauling all of the code. > > Patches are okay for someone familiar with the code. For others, they > require more effort. Yes. It's just that I needed to convince myself that the approach is good, and that meant writing the supporting code. Since I had the code I didn't see a reason not to send it :) > -- > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
