On 10/30/2011 06:53 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > KVM needs to know perf capability to decide which PMU it can expose to a > guest. > > Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 11 +++++++++++ > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 11 +++++++++++ > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h | 2 ++ > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 3 +++ > 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > Peter, can you please review this, and if all is well, either apply or ack? -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html