On 10/25/2011 08:24 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote: > > So then do also you foresee the need for directed yield at some point, > to address LHP? provided we have good improvements to prove. Doesn't this patchset completely eliminate lock holder preemption? -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html