Re: [PATCH 2/3] kvm: use this_cpu_xxx replace percpu_xxx funcs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/24/2011 04:50 AM, Alex,Shi wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 15:34 +0800, Alex,Shi wrote:
> > percpu_xxx funcs are duplicated with this_cpu_xxx funcs, so replace them
> > for further code clean up.
> > 
> > And in preempt safe scenario, __this_cpu_xxx funcs has a bit better
> > performance since __this_cpu_xxx has no redundant preempt_disable()
> > 
>
> Avi: 
> Would you like to give some comments of this? 
>

Sorry, was travelling:

Acked-by: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux