On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:50:53AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> As long as MSI-X is disabled, it's incorrect to invoke
> msix_handle_mask_update on per-vector mask changes. That may misguide
> the config notifier callback or spuriously trigger an MSI event.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
And msix_is_pending is cleared on vector unuse, so
how can a spurious MSI event happen?
> ---
> hw/msix.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/msix.c b/hw/msix.c
> index e351c68..f5c8d08 100644
> --- a/hw/msix.c
> +++ b/hw/msix.c
> @@ -277,12 +277,16 @@ static void msix_mmio_write(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr,
> bool was_masked = msix_is_masked(dev, vector);
>
> pci_set_long(dev->msix_table_page + offset, val);
> - if (kvm_enabled() && kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
> - kvm_msix_update(dev, vector, was_masked, msix_is_masked(dev, vector));
> - }
>
> - if (was_masked != msix_is_masked(dev, vector)) {
> - msix_handle_mask_update(dev, vector);
> + if (msix_enabled(dev)) {
> + if (kvm_enabled() && kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
> + kvm_msix_update(dev, vector, was_masked,
> + msix_is_masked(dev, vector));
> + }
> +
> + if (was_masked != msix_is_masked(dev, vector)) {
> + msix_handle_mask_update(dev, vector);
> + }
> }
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
