Re: virtio localdisk performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> dd performs buffered I/O by default.  That means it just writes to the
> page cache and the kernel decides when to write out dirty pages.
>
> So your host probably has a bunch more RAM than the guest - dd
> write(2) calls are simply dirtying memory.  Your guest has less RAM
> and needs to do actual block I/O.  That's why the results are so
> different.
>
> You are not measuring virtio-blk performance here.  Use dd
> oflag=direct to bypass the page cache and actually do block I/O.

You are right the change is impressive, but still there is a big difference:
dd oflag=direct bs=6M count=1000 if=/dev/zero of=titi.txt

i get on the host:
6291456000 bytes (6.3 GB) copied, 29.8403 s, 211 MB/s
and in the vm:
6291456000 bytes (6.3 GB) copied, 51.3302 s, 123 MB/s

Thanks,
Benoit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux