Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for October 11th

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/11/2011 09:01 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/11/2011 03:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
What I'm trying to avoid is making choices today that close the door on
better fixes in the future.


I think Juan made a really good point in his earlier post.  We need to
focus on better testing for migration.  With a solid migration torture
test, we can probably eliminate much of the problems we're facing today.

Agree, fingerprinting vmstate should help a lot.  Actually I don't think
the visitor is strictly required, the fingerprinter can just walk
vmstate structs.

You mean generating a schema?  I was talking about an active migration torture test.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux