On 10/11/2011 09:01 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/11/2011 03:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
What I'm trying to avoid is making choices today that close the door on
better fixes in the future.
I think Juan made a really good point in his earlier post. We need to
focus on better testing for migration. With a solid migration torture
test, we can probably eliminate much of the problems we're facing today.
Agree, fingerprinting vmstate should help a lot. Actually I don't think
the visitor is strictly required, the fingerprinter can just walk
vmstate structs.
You mean generating a schema? I was talking about an active migration torture test.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
