On 2011-10-10 11:40, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 08:54 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-10-09 20:52, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
>>> ---
>>> qemu-options.hx | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> vl.c | 2 ++
>>> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/qemu-options.hx b/qemu-options.hx
>>> index 3a13533..9f60059 100644
>>> --- a/qemu-options.hx
>>> +++ b/qemu-options.hx
>>> @@ -2483,6 +2483,29 @@ DEF("kvm-shadow-memory", HAS_ARG, QEMU_OPTION_kvm_shadow_memory,
>>> " allocate MEGABYTES for kvm mmu shadowing\n",
>>> QEMU_ARCH_I386)
>>>
>>> +DEF("hyperv", HAS_ARG, QEMU_OPTION_hyperv,
>>> + "-hyperv [vapic=on|off][,spinlock=retries][,wd=on|off]\n"
>>> + " enable Hyper-V Enlightenment\n",
>>> + QEMU_ARCH_ALL)
>>
>> These are CPU feature, so -cpu +/-hv_vapic,+/-hv_spinlock etc. looks
>> more appropriate than a new command line parameter.
>>
> I would like to keep hyper-v settings apart from cpu features for a very
> simple reason: if hyper-v VMBus support will be added one day, it won't
> be a CPU only feature anymore.
Then that feature would be controlled by adding the corresponding
device. There is no need for -hyperv.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
