On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 12:51:39AM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > I have some questions. > > - Could we later use this bio_map_sg() to implement blk_rq_map_sg() and > remove some duplicated code? I didn't even think about that, but it actually looks very possible to factor the "meat" in the for each bvec loop into a common helper used by both. > - Don't you need to support a chained bio (bio->next != NULL)? Because > I did not see any looping in the last patch > [PATCH 5/5] virtio-blk: implement ->make_request > Or is it that ->make_request() is a single bio at a time? > If so could we benefit from both bio-chaining and sg-chaning to > make bigger IOs? At this point ->make_request is a single bio interface. I have some WIP patches to do the onstack plugging per bio, at which point it would change to take a list. For this to work we'd need major changes to all ->make_request drivers. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
