[PATCH] e1000: Don't set the Capabilities List bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The Capabilities Pointer is NULL, so this bit shouldn't be set. The state of
this bit doesn't appear to change any behavior on Linux/Windows versions we've
tested, but it does cause Windows' PCI/PCI Express Compliance Test to balk.

I happen to have a physical 82540EM controller, and it also sets the
Capabilities Bit, but it actually has items on the capabilities list to go
with it :)

Signed-off-by: dann frazier <dann.frazier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 hw/e1000.c |    2 --
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/e1000.c b/hw/e1000.c
index fe3e812..3d92128 100644
--- a/hw/e1000.c
+++ b/hw/e1000.c
@@ -1166,8 +1166,6 @@ static int pci_e1000_init(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
 
     pci_config_set_vendor_id(pci_conf, PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL);
     pci_config_set_device_id(pci_conf, E1000_DEVID);
-    /* TODO: we have no capabilities, so why is this bit set? */
-    pci_set_word(pci_conf + PCI_STATUS, PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST);
     pci_conf[PCI_REVISION_ID] = 0x03;
     pci_config_set_class(pci_conf, PCI_CLASS_NETWORK_ETHERNET);
     /* TODO: RST# value should be 0, PCI spec 6.2.4 */
-- 
1.7.6.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux