On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:05:17PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 23:00:44 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 07:33:07PM +0300, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > Maybe this is better solved by copying the way it was done in PCI itself > > > with capability linked list? > > > > There are any number of ways to lay out the structure. I went for what > > seemed a simplest one. For MSI-X the train has left the station. We > > can probably still tweak where the high 32 bit features > > for 64 bit features are. No idea if it's worth it. > > Sorry, this has been in the back of my mind. I think it's a good idea; > can we use the capability linked list for pre-device specific stuff from > now on? > > Thanks, > Rusty. Do we even want capability bits then? We can give each capability an ack flag ... -- MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
