Hi, On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/07/2011 02:20 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:42 AM, Avi Kivity<avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Linus, please pull from >> > >> > git://github.com/avikivity/kvm.git kvm-updates/3.1 >> > >> > to receive a fix for a build failure due to a missing instruction size >> > suffix in inline assembly. >> >> Again, please give me a warm and fuzzy feeling that this is really >> Avi, and the right thing to do, rather than just a "please pull from >> this random tree". > > Yup, it's the genuine thing here, and the s/mul/mulq/ is not an incredibly > clever backdoor. > >> It's not that I don't think you are you, but I want people to actually >> *think* about what they are doing and sending me. When you give me a >> kernel.org address, I know you have access to kernel.org, and that >> makes me believe you are you. When you give me a github address, that >> doesn't really mean anything. >> > > Well, these days access to kernel.org proves a lot less than it used to, > unfortunately. > How comes that companies who directly participate in the kernel development[0] cannot setup servers that would host trees of their employee ? In which case, kernel.org would just be a mirror for those tree. Thanks, - Arnaud [0]: from the top of my mind, RedHat, SuSe/Novell, Canonical, IBM, Intel, ... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
