PCI-passthrough - issues/questions/ideas

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I just wanted to introduce a problem I currently face including some questions regarding my temporary fix. Anyway, I have a PCI-device that I want to passthrough to a hvm guest. Now there are several problems that add up:

a) the PCI-device is bound to a PCI-to-PCI bridge (which in turn is directly attached to the rootbus) (mainboard has a AMD 970/SB950 chipset).
[since pciIsParent shows that the secondary bus equals the device's bus]:

    bridge:
> lspci -s00:14.4 -vvv | grep Bus:
> Bus: primary=00, secondary=07, subordinate=07, sec-latency=64

    PCI-device
> 07:06.0 Multimedia controller: Philips Semiconductors SAA7146 (rev 01)

b) neither the bridge nor the PCI device itself have the currently implemented reset functionality that you trigger in pciResetDevice

c) the PCI-device is mapped through the PCI bridge (IOMMU-wise):

    ACPI IOMMU dump:
> [    1.121239] AMD-Vi:   DEV_SELECT             devid: 00:14.4 flags: 00
> [ 1.121274] AMD-Vi: DEV_ALIAS_RANGE devid: 07:00.0 flags: 00 devid_to: 00:14.4
> [    1.121311] AMD-Vi:   DEV_RANGE_END         devid: 07:1f.7


What I did to get (temporarily and in a rather hackish (maybe even wrong) manner) rid of the problem, is to ignore the error thrown in pciResetDevice when no reset had been possible at all.

    if (ret < 0) {
/*
    -- I know what you did last summer!

        virErrorPtr err = virGetLastError();
        pciReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
                       _("Unable to reset PCI device %s: %s"),
                       dev->name,
err ? err->message : _("no FLR, PM reset or bus reset available"));
*/
        ret = 0;
    }


Concludingly I'd ask the following questions:

a) Why is a secondary_bus_reset a bad idea if the "device in question"'s _primary_ bus is the root bus? b) Why would it be a bad idea adding some sort of 'override attribute' to the guest's config, so libvirt may intentionally skip the reset? What are the possible consequences if no reset takes place at all? c) What options do I have besides implementing c) or just going the dirty way and ignore the case when no reset is possible (like I described above)?

PS : Since I am not subscribed, please CC to me
PPS: Please cut me slack ;)


regards,
Patrick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux