Re: Virtual drives performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/07/11 00:25, TooMeeK wrote:

Next, I've tried following combinations with virt-manager 0.8.4 (from XML of VM):
1.on Debian VM with virtio drivers for both storage and NIC:
<disk type='block' device='disk'>
<source dev='/dev/md3'/>
<target dev='vdb' bus='virtio'/>
partition type used in guest: EXT4
result: poor performance, 9-10MB/s sequentional copy via SMB
2.on Debian VM with virtio drivers:
<disk type='block' device='disk' cache='writeback'>
<source dev='/dev/md3'/>
<target dev='vdb' bus='virtio'/>
partition type used: EXT4
result: poor performance, 10-15MB/s sequentional copy via SMB
3.Direct attached partition to FreeBSD VM without virtio support (e1000 NIC and SCSI disk):
<disk type='block' device='disk' cache='writeback'>

Shouldn't have you used cache=none when using virtio?
http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Tuning_KVM
how is that performance with cache none?

Also note that when you don't specify it, I think the default is not none. Maybe it is writethrough, I don't remember.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux