On 08/26/2011 06:53 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:18:01AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote: >> On 08/25/2011 09:47 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: >> >>> I guess it is OK to be more trigger happy with zapping by ignoring >>> the accessed bit, clearing the flood counter on page fault. >>> >> >> Yeah, i like this way, is this patch good for you? > > Looks fine, can you rerun kernbench? > Sure, i tested the performance of this way, there is the result: The origin way: 2m56.561 2m50.651 2m51.220 2m52.199 2m48.066 The way of using accessed bit: 2m51.194 2m55.980 2m50.755 2m47.396 2m46.807 The way of ignoring accessed bit: 2m45.547 2m44.551 2m55.840 2m56.333 2m45.534 I think the result is not bad. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
