On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 08:08 -0700, David Evensky wrote: > Adding in the rest of what ivshmem does shouldn't affect our use, *I > think*. I hadn't intended this to do everything that ivshmem does, > but I can see how that would be useful. It would be cool if it could > grow into that. David, I've added most of ivshmem on top of your driver (still working on fully understanding the client-server protocol). The changes that might affect your use have been simple: * The shared memory BAR is now 2 instead of 0. * Vendor and device IDs changed. * The device now has MSI-X capability in the header and supporting code to run it. If these points won't affect your use I think there shouldn't be any other issues. -- Sasha. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
