On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Introducing yet another non-standard and non-Linux interface doesn't
> help though. If there is no significant improvement over ivshmem then
> it makes sense to let ivshmem gain critical mass and more users
> instead of fragmenting the space.
Look, I'm not going to require QEMU compatibility from tools/kvm
contributors. If you guys really feel that strongly about the
interface, then either
- Get Rusty's "virtio spec pixie pee" for ivshmem
- Get the Linux driver merged to linux-next
- Help out David and Sasha to change interface
But don't ask me to block clean code from inclusion to tools/kvm
because it doesn't have a QEMU-capable interface.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
