On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 23:52 -0500, Alexander Graf wrote: > > Isn't ivshmem in QEMU? If so, then I don't think there isn't any > > competition. How do you feel that these are competing? > > Well, it means that you will inside the guest have two different > devices depending whether you're using QEMU or kvm-tool. I don't see > the point in exposing different devices to the guest just because of > NIH. Why should a guest care which device emulation framework you're > using? It's a pretty special-purpose device that requires user configuration so I don't consider QEMU compatibility to be mandatory. It'd be nice to have but not something to bend over backwards for. Pekka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
