Re: [PATCH 09/10] KVM: PPC: Support SC1 hypercalls for PAPR in PR mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 12.08.2011 um 09:43 schrieb David Gibson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:35:42AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> 
>> Am 12.08.2011 um 05:33 schrieb David Gibson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> 
>>> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 06:31:47PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>> PAPR defines hypercalls as SC1 instructions. Using these, the guest modifies
>>>> page tables and does other privileged operations that it wouldn't be allowed
>>>> to do in supervisor mode.
>>>> 
>>>> This patch adds support for PR KVM to trap these instructions and route them
>>>> through the same PAPR hypercall interface that we already use for HV style
>>>> KVM.
>>> 
>>> This will work on a powermac or bare metal host.  Unfortunately, it's
>>> not enough on a pSeries LPAR host - the sc 1 instruction from the
>>> guest problem state will go direct to the hypervisor, which will
>>> return an error rather than trapping to the guest kernel.
>>> 
>>> The only way around this I can see is for qemu to search for and patch
>>> up sc 1 instructions to something else.  Obviously that would also
>>> need some kernel support, and probably a capability to let it know if
>>> it's necessary.
>> 
>> Well I'd like to keep Qemu out of the patching business, so the
>> guest kernel would have to patch itself.
> 
> Well sure, but guest patching itself means it can't run existing
> kernels.  I thought qemu already patched a few things, ugly though
> that approach is.

Nope, qemu doesn't patch guest code by itself. The only time the guest kernel doesn't patch itself is the TPR acceleration for Windows - because we can't modify the guest here.

I also don't think it's that important to support older Linux guests if it means we need to patch the guest from the outside :). If you really need to use PHyP, just run a newer guest kernel or -M mac99.

One thing I agree with though is that we should fail the CAP enable if we run on broken hypervisors.

Alex

> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux