Re: [PATCH] kvm tools: Change method of retrieving process name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 17:56 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > * Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> >> This patch changes './kvm list' to retrieve process name from
>> >> '/proc/<pid>/stat' instead of '/proc/<pid>/comm' as it appears the latter
>> >> does not exist by default on several systems.
>> >>
>> >> Reported-by: pradeep <psuriset@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> ---
>> >>  tools/kvm/builtin-list.c |   21 ++++++++++++++-------
>> >>  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/tools/kvm/builtin-list.c b/tools/kvm/builtin-list.c
>> >> index 2d37ecb..89a0465 100644
>> >> --- a/tools/kvm/builtin-list.c
>> >> +++ b/tools/kvm/builtin-list.c
>> >> @@ -13,25 +13,32 @@
>> >>  static void print_guest(const char *name, int pid)
>> >>  {
>> >>       char proc_name[PATH_MAX];
>> >> -     char comm[sizeof(PROCESS_NAME)];
>> >> -     int fd;
>> >> +     char *comm = NULL;
>> >> +     FILE *fd;
>> >>
>> >> -     sprintf(proc_name, "/proc/%d/comm", pid);
>> >> -     fd = open(proc_name, O_RDONLY);
>> >> -     if (fd <= 0)
>> >> +     sprintf(proc_name, "/proc/%d/stat", pid);
>> >> +     fd = fopen(proc_name, "r");
>> >> +     if (fd == NULL)
>> >>               goto cleanup;
>> >
>> > No, instead we should fall back to 'stat' if the 'comm' access fails.
>> > The 'stat' field contains a lot more data and is thus slower - while
>> > 'comm' only outputs the comm.
>>
>> Doh. I already merged the patch. Sasha, can you please send an
>> incremental one to fix it up?
>
> Does it matter when running './kvm list'? The speed difference isn't
> really noticeable and it's not something that runs all the time.

What's the downside? I think it's a reasonable optimization to do
although like Ingo already said, it's probably not very noticeable.
But hey, you never know what people will use the code for in the
future.

                           Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux