Re: kvm PCI assignment & VFIO ramblings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/03/2011 05:04 AM, David Gibson wrote:
I still don't understand the distinction you're making.  We're saying
the group is "owned" by a given user or guest in the sense that no-one
else may use anything in the group (including host drivers).  At that
point none, some or all of the devices in the group may actually be
used by the guest.

You seem to be making a distinction between "owned by" and "assigned
to" and "used by" and I really don't see what it is.


Alex (and I) think that we should work with device/function granularity, as is common with other archs, and that the group thing is just a constraint on which functions may be assigned where, while you think that we should work at group granularity, with 1-function groups for archs which don't have constraints.

Is this an accurate way of putting it?

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux