Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] virtio_net: refill buffer right after being used

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Shirley Ma <mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Resubmit it with a typo fix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shirley Ma <xma@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 0c7321c..c8201d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -429,6 +429,22 @@ static int add_recvbuf_mergeable(struct virtnet_info *vi, gfp_t gfp)
>        return err;
>  }
>
> +static int fill_one(struct virtnet_info *vi, gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> +       int err;
> +
> +       if (vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
> +               err = add_recvbuf_mergeable(vi, gfp);
> +       else if (vi->big_packets)
> +               err = add_recvbuf_big(vi, gfp);
> +       else
> +               err = add_recvbuf_small(vi, gfp);
> +
> +       if (err >= 0)
> +               ++vi->num;
> +       return err;
> +}
> +
>  /* Returns false if we couldn't fill entirely (OOM). */
>  static bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info *vi, gfp_t gfp)
>  {
> @@ -436,17 +452,10 @@ static bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info *vi, gfp_t gfp)
>        bool oom;
>
>        do {
> -               if (vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
> -                       err = add_recvbuf_mergeable(vi, gfp);
> -               else if (vi->big_packets)
> -                       err = add_recvbuf_big(vi, gfp);
> -               else
> -                       err = add_recvbuf_small(vi, gfp);
> -
> +               err = fill_one(vi, gfp);
>                oom = err == -ENOMEM;
>                if (err < 0)
>                        break;
> -               ++vi->num;
>        } while (err > 0);
>        if (unlikely(vi->num > vi->max))
>                vi->max = vi->num;
> @@ -506,13 +515,13 @@ again:
>                receive_buf(vi->dev, buf, len);
>                --vi->num;
>                received++;
> -       }
> -
> -       if (vi->num < vi->max / 2) {
> -               if (!try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_ATOMIC))
> +               if (fill_one(vi, GFP_ATOMIC) < 0)
>                        schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>        }
>
> +       /* notify buffers are refilled */
> +       virtqueue_kick(vi->rvq);
> +

How does this reduce latency?   We are doing the same amount of work
in both cases, and in both cases the newly available buffers are not
visible to the device until the virtqueue_kick..


>        /* Out of packets? */
>        if (received < budget) {
>                napi_complete(napi);
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux