On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Zhi Yong Wu <zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Zhi Yong Wu <zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 04:59:06PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>>>>>>> Welcome to give me your comments, thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> Makefile.objs | 2 +-
>>>>>>> block.c | 288 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>>>> block.h | 1 -
>>>>>>> block/blk-queue.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>> block/blk-queue.h | 70 +++++++++++++
>>>>>>> block_int.h | 28 +++++
>>>>>>> blockdev.c | 21 ++++
>>>>>>> qemu-config.c | 24 +++++
>>>>>>> qemu-option.c | 17 +++
>>>>>>> qemu-option.h | 1 +
>>>>>>> qemu-options.hx | 1 +
>>>>>>> 11 files changed, 559 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>>> create mode 100644 block/blk-queue.c
>>>>>>> create mode 100644 block/blk-queue.h
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/Makefile.objs b/Makefile.objs
>>>>>>> index 9f99ed4..06f2033 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/Makefile.objs
>>>>>>> +++ b/Makefile.objs
>>>>>>> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ block-nested-y += raw.o cow.o qcow.o vdi.o vmdk.o cloop.o dmg.o bochs.o vpc.o vv
>>>>>>> block-nested-y += qcow2.o qcow2-refcount.o qcow2-cluster.o qcow2-snapshot.o qcow2-cache.o
>>>>>>> block-nested-y += qed.o qed-gencb.o qed-l2-cache.o qed-table.o qed-cluster.o
>>>>>>> block-nested-y += qed-check.o
>>>>>>> -block-nested-y += parallels.o nbd.o blkdebug.o sheepdog.o blkverify.o
>>>>>>> +block-nested-y += parallels.o nbd.o blkdebug.o sheepdog.o blkverify.o blk-queue.o
>>>>>>> block-nested-$(CONFIG_WIN32) += raw-win32.o
>>>>>>> block-nested-$(CONFIG_POSIX) += raw-posix.o
>>>>>>> block-nested-$(CONFIG_CURL) += curl.o
>>>>>>> diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
>>>>>>> index 24a25d5..e54e59c 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/block.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/block.c
>>>>>>> @@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
>>>>>>> #include "module.h"
>>>>>>> #include "qemu-objects.h"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +#include "qemu-timer.h"
>>>>>>> +#include "block/blk-queue.h"
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_BSD
>>>>>>> #include <sys/types.h>
>>>>>>> #include <sys/stat.h>
>>>>>>> @@ -58,6 +61,13 @@ static int bdrv_read_em(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
>>>>>>> static int bdrv_write_em(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
>>>>>>> const uint8_t *buf, int nb_sectors);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +static bool bdrv_exceed_bps_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, int nb_sectors,
>>>>>>> + bool is_write, double elapsed_time, uint64_t *wait);
>>>>>>> +static bool bdrv_exceed_iops_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, bool is_write,
>>>>>>> + double elapsed_time, uint64_t *wait);
>>>>>>> +static bool bdrv_exceed_io_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, int nb_sectors,
>>>>>>> + bool is_write, uint64_t *wait);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> static QTAILQ_HEAD(, BlockDriverState) bdrv_states =
>>>>>>> QTAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(bdrv_states);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @@ -90,6 +100,20 @@ int is_windows_drive(const char *filename)
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> #endif
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +static int bdrv_io_limits_enable(BlockIOLimit *io_limits)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> + if ((io_limits->bps[0] == 0)
>>>>>>> + && (io_limits->bps[1] == 0)
>>>>>>> + && (io_limits->bps[2] == 0)
>>>>>>> + && (io_limits->iops[0] == 0)
>>>>>>> + && (io_limits->iops[1] == 0)
>>>>>>> + && (io_limits->iops[2] == 0)) {
>>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + return 1;
>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> /* check if the path starts with "<protocol>:" */
>>>>>>> static int path_has_protocol(const char *path)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> @@ -167,6 +191,28 @@ void path_combine(char *dest, int dest_size,
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +static void bdrv_block_timer(void *opaque)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> + BlockDriverState *bs = opaque;
>>>>>>> + BlockQueue *queue = bs->block_queue;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + while (!QTAILQ_EMPTY(&queue->requests)) {
>>>>>>> + BlockIORequest *request;
>>>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + request = QTAILQ_FIRST(&queue->requests);
>>>>>>> + QTAILQ_REMOVE(&queue->requests, request, entry);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + ret = qemu_block_queue_handler(request);
>>>>>>> + if (ret == 0) {
>>>>>>> + QTAILQ_INSERT_HEAD(&queue->requests, request, entry);
>>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + qemu_free(request);
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> void bdrv_register(BlockDriver *bdrv)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> if (!bdrv->bdrv_aio_readv) {
>>>>>>> @@ -642,6 +688,15 @@ int bdrv_open(BlockDriverState *bs, const char *filename, int flags,
>>>>>>> bs->change_cb(bs->change_opaque, CHANGE_MEDIA);
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> + /* throttling disk I/O limits */
>>>>>>> + if (bdrv_io_limits_enable(&bs->io_limits)) {
>>>>>>> + bs->block_queue = qemu_new_block_queue();
>>>>>>> + bs->block_timer = qemu_new_timer_ns(vm_clock, bdrv_block_timer, bs);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + bs->slice_start[0] = qemu_get_clock_ns(vm_clock);
>>>>>>> + bs->slice_start[1] = qemu_get_clock_ns(vm_clock);
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It should be possible to tune the limits on the flight, please introduce
>>>>>> QMP commands for that.
>>>>> Yeah, I am working on this.
>>>>
>>>> It's worth mentioning that the I/O limits commands can use Supriya's
>>>> new block_set command for changing block device parameters at runtime.
>>>> So I think the runtime limits changing can be a separate patch.
>>> Since I/O limits commands will depend on Supriya's block_set patch,
>>> when will her patch be merged into qemu.git?
>>
>> The block_set patch is on the mailing list with an ongoing discussion.
>> Until agreement is reached it will not be merged - hard to tell when
>> exactly that will be, but hopefully over the next few days.
>>
>> You can always add temporary QMP/HMP commands in order to test setting
>> limits at runtime. It should be easy to switch to a different QMP/HMP
>> command later, if necessary.
>
> Just to clarify: adding temporary QMP/HMP commands in your personal
> git repo can be useful for development and testing. It will let you
> continue fleshing out things like block device hotplug. Of course
> qemu.git can only merge commands that we intend to support for the
> future, so a final QMP/HMP interface needs to be written at some point
> but it does not stop you from making progress.
No matter. no pain, no gain. by adding temporary QMP/HMP commands, i
can learn about block device hotplug. I think that it is worth doing
it.
>
> Stefan
>
--
Regards,
Zhi Yong Wu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
