* Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 25.07.2011, at 12:16, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > >> > >>> So it was a no brainer for me to pull it into -tip. > >> > >> The thing I don't agree with is that it should live in the > >> kernel tree. > > > > FYI, tools/kvm/ *already* lives in the kernel tree - that is how > > it's developed and used and it also shares code with the kernel. > > So you're just trying to make this a self-fulfilling prophecy now? No, i'm just trying to point out to you that it's already a fact that the tool already lives in a kernel tree and was developed there to the tune of 700+ commits within a few short months. IMO you should not be arguing: 'You should do X because that's my preference.' IMO you should be arguing: 'You should do X because technical advantage Y which is important to the project.' We have listed numerous technical advantages of why we have chosen tools/kvm/ - and you have not countered that with any convincing technical disadvantage so far. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
