On 25.07.2011, at 10:37, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Hi Alexander, > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Damn you Ingo Molnar, I knew you'd somehow get all the credit for our >>> hard work! ;-) >> >> Well, IIUC he's the one initiating the whole thing, no? > > As much as I appreciate Ingo's help and support with the project, no, > I don't consider him to have initiated the whole thing. Yes, it's his > idea and that's what got me into hacking on the thing in the first > place. But calling this Ingo's crusade is somewhat missing the point. > It's really people like Asias, Sasha, Cyrill, and Prashad who have > made all the heavy lifting. > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> More seriously, though, I fail to see what's bothering you Alexander. >>> I and Ingo already mentioned we wouldn't be hacking on Qemu even if >>> there wasn't no tools/kvm. It's not as if we're putting *your* user >>> space code into the kernel tree - we wrote our own! What's wrong with >>> that? >> >> Nothing. I like competition. But why push it into the kernel? It's not a kernel, it's not a library the kernels needs for internal stuff. So why would it have to be in there? > > For the same reasons we want tools/perf to be there. Yeah, I want a pony too. Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
