Hi Avi,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Are you talking about Documentation/lguest/lguest.c? How would you
>> suggest we unify our code with that?
>
> It should be easy to have tools/kvm drive lguest - they're both virtio
> based. All you need to do is provide yet another ops structure to drive the
> two ABIs.
Right, we could do that. But for what purpose? I thought Lguest ABI
was mostly for educational and testing purposes.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I guess lguest.c has to remain, as point of lguest was a simple teaching aid
> for virtualization (which doesn't work very well, as the techniques it uses
> are obsolete).
Yup, I don't see point in merging lguest.c with tools/kvm.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
