On 07/05/2011 09:49 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> If 'ret' has been used to silence compiler warnings about functions > which have been declared with attribute __warn_unused_result__ > (eg write() and various other libc functions) then "(void)write()" > is insufficient -- gcc requires the variable. gcc being silly. Oh well.
In this particular case I think that the return value should be checked. It's good if something is printed in the log saying that the reset wasn't done for some reason---even if it is just defensive.
The really silly thing is in glibc, not gcc. __warn_unused_result__ was added to fwrite, where you have no certainty that the write has been done, but not to either fclose or fflush. Oh well...
Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html