On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 23:53 -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 06/30/2011 06:54 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:29 -0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> >> + if (static_branch(¶virt_steal_enabled)) {
> >
> > How is that going to compile on !CONFIG_PARAVIRT or !x86 in general?
> > Only x86-PARAVIRT will provide that variable.
> >
> >
>
> Good point. I'd wrap it into CONFIG_PARAVIRT.
> To be clear, the reason I did not put it inside
> CONFIG_PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING, is because I wanted to have the mere
> display of steal time separated from the rest - unless, of course, you
> object this idea.
>
> Using CONFIG_PARAVIRT achieves this goal well.
ia64 seems to also have CONFIG_PARAVIRT
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
