Re: [PATCH 0/2] Introduce panic hypercall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/20/2011 08:13 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>  A watchdog has the advantage that is also detects lockups.
>
>  In fact you could implement the panic device via the existing
>  watchdogs.  Simply program the timer for the minimum interval and
>  *don't* service the interrupt.  This would work for non-virt setups as
>  well as another way to issue a reset.

If you manage to bring down the other guest CPUs fast enough. Otherwise,
they may corrupt your crashdump before the host had a chance to collect
all pieces. Synchronous signaling to the hypervisor is a bit safer.

You could NMI-IPI them. But I agree a synchronous signal is better (note it's not race-free itself).

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux