Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] ARM: KVM: Handle guest faults in KVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/11/2011 01:37 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>
>  Okay, this is about a zillion times simpler than x86.  Congratulations.

Well, I need to handle the I/O aborts, but it's quite simple. What
makes it much more complicated on x86?

- lack of nested paging on earlier processors
- 97 different paging modes
- lots of extra bits bringing in wierd functionality
- lots of optimizations

>
>  What are your thoughts about mmu notifier support?

For what purpose? There is no swapping on ARM, so only case that jumps
to my mind is for KSM. And I'm not quite there yet :)

Really? I imaging swapping will be needed for server workloads. mmu notifiers are also useful for transparent hugepages and page migrations. I imagine these will all follow if ARM servers take off.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux