On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 21:57 +0100, Prasad Joshi wrote: > > Assuming the data is just mixed up, I'm not completely happy that > > we're making random seeks almost 5% slower. Any ideas why that's > > happening? > > Yes they are mixed. > > I am assuming, probably delay while caching. That doesn't make sense to me. Why would "caching delay" be significantly slower than the non-cached version where we do full read all the time? Maybe I didn't quite understand the code but that sounds like a bug lurking somewhere in the caching code - maybe we cache too much or something? Pekka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
