Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] KVM in-guest performance monitoring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/17/2011 12:52 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 05/11/2011 06:55 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
perf maintainers: please consider the first three patches for merging (the first two make sense even without the rest). If you're familiar with the Intel
PMU, please review patch 5 as well - it effectively undoes all your work
of abstracting the PMU into perf_events by unabstracting perf_events into what
is hoped is a very similar PMU.

Perf maintainers, ping?


Re-ping?

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux