On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 04:58:16AM -0400, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 05/31/2011 11:44 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > I think it's safe to drop -enable-nesting immediately. Dan, does > > > libvirt make use of it? > > > > Yes, but it should be safe to drop it. Currently, if the user specifies > > a CPU with the 'svm' flag present in libvirt guest XML, then we will > > pass args '-cpu ....+svm -enable-nesting'. So if we drop --enable-nesting, > > then libvirt will simply omit it and everything should still work because > > we have still got +svm set. > > But qemu will complain about an option it can't parse. The best choice is probably to keep the option and make it a nop for the lifetime of qemu-kvm. Optionally qemu-kvm can print a warning about the deprecated option. Joerg -- AMD Operating System Research Center Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
