Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] kvm tools: Add rwlock wrapper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 30 May 2011 13:49:49 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Note, with cpu overcommit the results are going to be bad.
> 
> And that is good: if pushed hard enough it will trigger exciting (or 
> obscure) bugs in the guest kernel much faster than if there's no 
> overcommit, so it's rather useful for testing. (We made that 
> surprising experience with -rt.)
> 
> Also, such simulation would be very obviously useful if you get 
> bugreports about 1024 or 4096 CPUs, like i do sometimes! :-) [*]
> 

Yes, that is exactly what I wanted to see.
16 core server is the best I can use now, and usually I only use
4 core desktop!

  Takuya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux